So everybody now has this cool goal...and a bunch of them make it....more and more in fact. As a result, they have been forced yet again to raise the standards. At this point I think I worked out that you need to be in the top 10% of your age group to qualify for Boston.
I'm not complaining about that mind you..Boston is very crowded already so they needed to do something. And it's great having a race like that.
BUT...To be in the top 10%, you need everything: time to train, proper training technique, no injuries, lots of GUTS and good genes to tie it all together.
I kind of get annoyed sometimes when I see Boston-bound bloggers all revved up..they get all motivational.. "Shoot for your dreams! ....You could be doing this too! ...No Limits!", Uh huh.
I understand what they are trying to do (motivate people), and that's a good thing ...but it's a bit tricky. Unless you have the genes, you ain't gonna qualify for Boston.
There is a huge spectrum in running ability.."There's always somebody faster or slower than you" is a truism....for all but two people ;).
Each person stares at this spectrum and tries to see where they fit in. Those of us that are on the downward slope of the age curve love age grading because we can compare ourselves to the young-un's out there (including our former selves too).
Eventually you realize if Boston is even a remote possibility..and if not, all the rah rah seems a bit misguided.
When asked, as I always will be by a new acquaintance, "Are you running Boston?" I say, no, I'm not fast enough and I have a lot of work to do to even attempt to qualify. (e.g. lose 15 lbs, train like a maniac and not get injured, etc)
This why I absolutely love the idea of the Marathon Maniacs. There is a set of rules on how awards are given and there is no importance on finishing time, only the number of marathons you do in a given time and/or in different places.
What a stroke of genius! Now we have goals that get as tough as you want (e.g. all 50 states in a year..4 marathons in 4 days are right up there at the top), but anybody can aspire to do almost any of the goals even without the super speedy 10% genes you need to BQ. The bronze level (the most common by far) requires two marathons in 16 days, or three in 90 days. Not trivial but totally doable. (Remember no speed required, power walking is just fine.).
Having done 6 out of the 8 marathons in one year I need to get silver level, I can say that it's a different kind of challenge than going fast. It takes just as much care and finesse and knowledge of your body and it's current limitations as trying to PR. You don't have time to recover from injuries or illness with 6 weeks between races (on average), so you need to figure out how to train and stay healthy. Now *thats* a sustainable challenge!
(I'll talk much more about the details of what this was like when I finish my "streak" (as the MM'ers call it) on June 12 at the San Lorenzo trail marathon and get my MM silver, hopefully not counting my chickens yet)
Even more amazing is that the guys that started MM are pretty darn fast themselves..even when they run lots of marathons they are still fast!. They could have made a more complex formula taking finishing times into account etc.
But they didn't. Yay for all of us! ...and kudos to them!
We even have the Half Maniacs club now for whom full marathons are too much of a time commitment! Or you can qualify for both 8)
But this running thing is getting more and more popular. We need more interesting challenges!
I enjoyed the "California Dreamin Series" although I found it a bit annoying that the award (a very nice jacket) was the same whether you did all half marathons or all fulls...it's good to have various step levels like the MM-ers have i think.
So bloggy-sphere friends.here's my "Challenge Challenge"...brainstorm and post any ideas you have! They can be things you do on your own (like the 100 pushups challege stuff) or group things, family things, things that require a big organization, anything goes! Are all the good ideas already out there? Hard to believe!
|can you guess where this is?|
From the sublime to the profane..
This is the second week after S2S and I feel pretty recovered. I was really dragged out on Tuesday's run but by Wednesday I was feeling really great...roaring back if you will.
A few people have been asking me if the multiple races are breaking me down or building me up. I worried about this too and I have to say that it looked like the former in the beginning, but now it's definitely the latter. Remember I don't run these races all-out! (....wouldn't survive to the next one 8)
In fact I've had kind of a running epiphany....I think I've learn now how to stay injury free and I think I know how to train a lot more effectively on lower miles (and potentially kick some PR ass when I get back to doing higher miles and targeting a race for a PR). I will talk more about this in a couple of months.
I have some travel coming up to a friends wedding but I hope to run while there..can you guess where it is from the photo?
Remember to think of good challenge ideas! Have a great weekend!
Looks like the Adirondacks to me, but brrrr...that would not be a good place for a wedding right now!ReplyDelete
I am one of those people who is glad they tightened Boston standards. It is the ONLY race you must qualify for, so it should stand for something. Used to be much, much tougher in the 80s.
But--I think the MM idea is great and admire you people who go after it!
@mszippy1: Yes, I don't disagree with that. Boston is quite crowded enough from what I hear!ReplyDelete
Just want more other things to work towards besides that!
First, thanks for your comment on my Blog. I do wear Newton shoes which are designed for Minimalist running. And, I still heel strike! I do know that Ian Adamson, a V.P. at Newton and a legendary Eco Challenge athlete took two years to get off his heels.
I do respectfully disagree with a little of your post here. After 2 1/2 years of dedicated training, I BQ'd in February. I have very average athletic genes. Less than average actually. One year in Little League I got one hit all season. I could not make one high school sports team. With the right mindset, training, and dedication, I believe that anyone can BQ.
Re the BQ genes thing. I don't think the science supports your contention. You may *think* you have no "athletic" genes but baseball doesn't have much to do with marathon running...
1) studies have shown that there is quite a large spread in improvement of V02Max with training. In fact, there are some people that show *no* improvement with training (it's a Gaussian type of curve).
2) The ratio of slow twitch to fast twitch fibers is also genetic. If you are very much a fast twitch person you will not be a good marathon runner. Yes, you can run marathons but you will be limited. This is also a Gaussian distribution.
You worked hard for your BQ and are really amazed and proud of yourself for getting there, as you should be! But...all of the dedication and mindset wouldn't have helped you if you had poor V02Max adaption and all fast twitch muscles. (the bad parts of both distributions)
There are even more examples of genetic adaptations that play for or against endurance sports...tendency to injuries, etc.
I focused on these two because they are the most important.
In summary, I think that all the stuff you mentioned in your comment on my blog is very important. But it is not sufficient. You also need reasonable genes for running (not for baseball or other 'team sports' that aren't endurance sports).
So, I think it bears being a little bit circumspect before we think that everybody can do what we do, being a BQ or a 5 hour marathon.
I think *almost* everybody can complete a marathon with sufficient motivation, but *not* almost everybody can BQ.
Sorry Chris, but Paul is correct. I should know--I went from medicine to fitness/wellness, teaching and researching exercise physiology, kinesiology, and so on, as well as doing personal training for clients AND myself for decades, AND I AM A SPRINTER. I am likely 80-90 percent fast twitch fibers in the extremities. I build muscle just looking at a weight rack and used to be able to do sprint workouts with the guys in cycling.....but my time trials sucked NO MATTER HOW HARD I WORKED. Everyone encouraged and expected me to do criteriums in cycling because of my sprint, but my steady state was so poor that I couldn't even keep up with the lowest category women racers to GET TO the sprint finish. So, I am a testiment to Paul's statement that "*almost* everybody can complete a marathon with sufficient motivation, but *not* almost everybody can BQ." I finished BSIM--twice--swore the first was my only bucket list one...now I'm into more insanity by signing up for Pike's Peak Ascent. But BQ?... sadly, no. I haven't even been able to come close to what the McMillan/Galloway formulas SAY I can do for the longer distances--the deviation from "predicted" gets worse the farther out you go based on my one mile ability. But I'm getting carried away here. And I DO agree with the general premise/attitude that, with "the right mideset, dedication, and training" we can do A LOT more than we think. And, Paul, I haven't looked at your numbers enough yet, but, based on what I HAVE seen, I'm not sure I'd rule you out for BQ, but I'll try to look more another time.ReplyDelete
So much for coming back here, Paul, to guess "Puget Sound" for the pic, compliment you on your post, and say that hubby & I will be in a plane to "Tall Tree" in a couple of days. Don't know if you'll be around. Staying downtown for part of the trip, will also be doing the CTR event in BB on the 3oth. I am thinking about another trip to do the CTR event you have planned in SC, not sure though. I've been travelling too much lately and I'm not sure it will work into my PPA training. But just FYI & Happy Easter, Ann
I've come to running later in life (I began when I was 41), I am dedicated to my training and can say that I may be able to BQ when I am 70. Possibly 75. I'm OK with that.ReplyDelete