tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1109090155728755589.post1226971441690517357..comments2024-01-09T04:21:16.688-08:00Comments on 50 is the new 30: A Garmin Puzzle, Part IIPaulhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06752798450146454511noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1109090155728755589.post-22259823525245546642012-07-02T15:11:04.331-07:002012-07-02T15:11:04.331-07:00Very interesting about the switchbacks - I did a 1...Very interesting about the switchbacks - I did a 10K trail race at Woodside in 2010 that had a ton of switchbacks and noticed that my garmin watch only read 6.0 miles instead of 6.2, this probably explains why my watch was short! I took my average pace anyways for the race, so I'm glad this confirms that my pace actually was the same then!Nellyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11613262056157769496noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1109090155728755589.post-30078684931991319542012-07-01T16:53:54.419-07:002012-07-01T16:53:54.419-07:00Super interesting, I didn't know that about sw...Super interesting, I didn't know that about switch backs (I don't run a lot of trail I guess so I wouldn't.)Paulettehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17086887061737386391noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1109090155728755589.post-51780965133495347332012-06-30T13:11:17.462-07:002012-06-30T13:11:17.462-07:00Not only was it a good catch by yourself (and Arth...Not only was it a good catch by yourself (and Arthur) that the total was off, however, you get additional props for figuring out that the switchbacks were the problem.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04846136358775915126noreply@blogger.com